Resilience has been generally described as “the process of negotiating, managing and adapting to significant sources of stress or trauma” [1]. However, it may also be described as a personality trait, indicating that the individual has the human ability to overcome significant stressors whilst maintaining or regaining physical or emotional health.
Resilience in terms of the field of aesthetics, may be determined as a continuum of experiencing obstacles or struggles through practice, and how a practitioner deals with these dynamic challenges.
This article aims to explore the contributing factors of specific burdens within the aesthetics arena in the UK and summarise the tools or ‘protective factors’ that we can employ to futureproof resilience in practice. These are qualities or conditions that enable you to rebound from challenges [2]. Benard (1991) emphasised that the optimal environment for resiliency to develop consisted of certain “protective factors”, such as family characteristics, individual personality attributes or dispositions, and environmental supports in place [3].
Healthcare providers (HCPs) within the cosmetic sector are discovering that the foundations of medical knowledge and therapeutic skills are only a fraction of the expertise required to run successful practices. Post-pandemic with a new government in place, HCPs need to be adaptable to the changing economic environment, rapidly evolving technology, regulatory pressures and the expectations of their social media fuelled patients. Fortunately, research on resilience determines that everyone possesses the ability to be resilient and recover from challenges [4].
Many tools for assessment are offered by various theorists, with the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) by Smith et al. (2008) being a popular and time-efficient way of scoring a persons’ resilience [2]. Recognising and evaluating resilience is crucial, as it allows individuals with low resilience to be identified, and enables the targeted interventions to be implemented.
Industry specific burdens
Regulatory challenges
Unfortunately, the aesthetic specialty in the UK is dominated by a harmful and persistent lack of regulation, leading to competition from non-clinical sectors, namely the beauty and cosmetics industries. The Chartered Trading Standards Institute described this as the “Wild West of untrained, unlicensed and uninsured individuals who may be putting lives in danger” [5].
Non-medics remain unregulated yet provide the same services in similar environments, without the elevated costs to the consumer. In broader terms, they are more likely to work for less, because they do not encounter the same overheads in training, insurance, continuous practice development, products or licencing/regulation.
"HCPs need to be adaptable to the changing economic environment, rapidly evolving technology, regulatory pressures and the expectations of their social media fuelled patients"
Patients potentially endure more serious outcomes, with reports of adverse events, injury, illness and most recently, death, at the hands of unqualified practitioners. The limited accountability of these providers can leave patients insufficient options in malpractice cases.
Demoralised medical practitioners are required to be professionally resilient while simultaneously being undercut by non-qualified injectors offering the same services, despite their higher legal accountability and professional standards.
Economic pressures
In the Spring of 2025, increases in the UK national minimum wage and national insurance were delivered by the Chancellor, which gave rise to escalating costs of employing staff. Clinic owners who are employers have been forced to look at labour costs more closely, putting pressure on their business structures. Hamilton Fraser [6] who report key tax and financial updates for aesthetic clinics, also warn of increased scrutiny by His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) where sole traders or limited companies are concerned, as the government firm up measures against tax avoidance and evasion. The Making Tax Digital (MTD) initiative also calls for accurate record keeping, and investment in MTD compliant software or professional bookkeeping. This challenges the clinic owner to another level of competency, negotiating what is profitable or even possible.
The cosmetic patient and the comparison culture
There is undeniable joy in providing aesthetic medical services addressing a physical issue that may impede a patients’ self-image. However, patients seeking aesthetic treatments are more likely to have mental health issues such as body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). This poses an escalated risk of patient dissatisfaction and legal action. Around 2% of people in the general population suffer BDD, this increases to approximately 20% in clinical settings [7].
Patient expectations can be significantly unrealistic, which places pressure on the medical practitioner to deliver perfection or idealised standards of beauty. Practitioners report an increasing proportion of emotional labour in their interactions with patients, whereby extended time must be taken to consult and explain myths or misinformation. We are firmly in an age where comparison culture has taken hold; social media allows people to see or believe altered images and beauty ideals. Misinformation is generally attributed to younger adults, and those who use social networks excessively [8], however it is becoming a more frequent occurrence across all age groups.
Wu et al. [9] report that aesthetic patients are likely to compare themselves to peers, people in the media, and appearance ideals. Social comparisons are documented with celebrities, cyber stars and peers who are considered more beautiful. The practitioner must therefore display cognitive resilience, maintain focus and direct the patient ethically and honestly, as well as dispelling the untruths and preconceptions.
Fear of being sued
In the UK there has been a notable rise in litigious culture extending beyond the scope of surgical procedures [10]. It is widely documented that patient’s dissatisfaction at aesthetic outcomes, failure of informed consent and inadequate post-treatment care are among leading allegations made by consumers of cosmetic procedures. Errors and near misses in clinical practice are associated with psychological distress in HCPs, who may be reluctant to seek help, thereby perpetuating feelings of depression, anxiety, shame and guilt [11].
Dealing with complaints can be very difficult and cost the HCP dearly in both time and energy. It is commonly reported that time is spent outside of normal clinical hours, through fear of complications or the threat of being reported to a professional body or impending legal action.
The role of emotional resilience is paramount when faced with criticism and managing difficult conversations. Additionally, ethical resilience is required to face commercial pressures that might push practitioners towards substandard practices or products.
Absenteeism, burnout and reduced productivity
In comparison to other sectors, healthcare workers experience elevated absenteeism related to mental health challenges and job burnout [12]. These findings originate from HCPs working long hours, working at unsocial times and reporting burnout or fatigue resulting from their stressful professional roles. Accommodating patients in the private sector can follow a similar pattern, as patients’ expectations on service are possibly greater. Absenteeism due to poor mental health will have a financial toll on the provider or employer, as will reduced productivity whilst at work due to mental health issues [13]. Whatever the setting, NHS or private, chronic exposure to psychosocial stressors places HCPs at greater risk of burnout, anxiety and depression [12].
Conclusion
Resilience is fundamental in aesthetics. Cultivating emotional, cognitive, physical, financial and business resilience can act as protective pieces of armour in a specialty that is often testing. These skills should be taught as a core competency beside clinical skills or knowledge. Resilience is clearly vital in business survival and being content within the aesthetics sector. It is a not only a desirable trait, but is essential for a safe, ethical and sustainable business. With most studies on the wellbeing of healthcare professionals lacking depth, often focusing on just one aspect of health or resilience, it remains a challenge to identify which strategies would be the most effective over time. To the author’s knowledge, no studies exist to examine the psychological health of medical aesthetics professionals or their environment. Future research is needed to explore and validate the unique nuances of resilience within aesthetics.
Suggested protective factors
- Peer support, mentoring and group memberships: Join or create safe spaces, where you can process stress, regulate challenges and escape professional judgement. Spaces like this can reduce feelings of isolation and promote learning. Gain memberships to peer networks, professional bodies or industry events. Above all, seek help and advice when needed, this is part of exercising resilience.
- Focus on physical and mental wellbeing: Exercise, stay flexible, build strength. Eat well, sleep well and practice gratitude. Do not over work, your health is your wealth! Make time for fun and hobbies even if just 20 minutes a day. Avoid self-medicating with alcohol or drugs.
- Self-worth and awareness: Do not allow anyone to shake your core beliefs. You have put years into your study and medical practice, now is the time to believe that you are an expert in your field. Know who you are, how your practice works, and how valuable you are. Do not compare yourself to anyone else. Celebrate your uniqueness and have confidence in the practitioner you have become.
- Emotional intelligence: If people complain, ask yourself “Could I have acted differently, done more, or is any part of this my fault?” If the answer is “no” then accept the situation, be calm, problem solve, protect yourself and do not allow the situation to take away one ounce of your self-worth.
- Ethics: Above all, be ethical; if you know you fall short of expertise, refer on. Know your limits and set limits.
References
1. Windle G, Bennett KM, Noyes J. A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:8.
2. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, et al. The Brief Resilience Scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med 2008;15(3):194–200.
3. Benard B. Fostering Resiliency in Kids: Protective Factors in the Family, School, and Community. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory; 1991.
4. Hurley LN. The relationship between resilience, coping, and social media (Master’s Theses, 3683). 2018.
https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/3683
5. https://www.tradingstandards.uk/
news-policy-campaigns/news-room/2025/
urgent-regulation-of-fat-injections
-fillers-and-botox-needed
6. https://www.hamiltonfraser.co.uk/content-hub/
top-tax-tips-for-aesthetic-practitioners
7. McGrath LR, Oey L, McDonald S, et al. Prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Body Image 2023;46:202–11.
8. Ceylan G, Wood W, Anderson IA. Sharing of misinformation is habitual, not just lazy or biased. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2023;120(13):e2216614120.
9. Wu Y, Mulkens S, Alleva JM. Body image and acceptance of cosmetic surgery in China and the Netherlands: A qualitative study on cultural differences and similarities. Body Image 2022;40:30–49.
10. Deng K, Deng X, Luo H, et al. Academic visualization study of aesthetic medicine management and related legal research since 2000. J Cosmet Dermatol 2024;23(8):2697–710.
11. Sirriyeh R, Lawton R, Gardner P, Armitage G. Coping with medical error: A systematic review of papers to assess the effects of involvement in medical errors on healthcare professionals’ psychological well-being. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19(6):e43.
12. Cohen C, Pignata S, Bezak E, et al. Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2023;13(6):e071203.
13. Prudenzi A, Graham CD, Flaxman PE, O’Connor DB. Wellbeing, burnout, and safe practice among healthcare professionals: predictive influences of mindfulness, values, and self-compassion. Psychol Health Med 2022;27(5):1130–43.
[All links last accessed 4 December 2025]
Declaration of competing interests: None declared.
